The secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial in the US and Puerto Rico showed that the beneficial effect of intensive treatment on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality did not persist after the trial, with increasing outpatient systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels in participants randomized to intensive treatment following the trial. The trial randomized 9361 participants (mean age 67.9 years, 35.6% women) from 2010, with trial intervention ending in 2015, and trial close-out visits through 2016. Over a median (IQR) intervention period of 3.3 years, intensive treatment was beneficial for both cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.83). However, at the extended median (IQR) follow-up of 8.8 years, there was no longer evidence of benefit for cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.02) or all-cause mortality (HR, 1.08). In a subgroup of 2944 participants, the estimated mean outpatient SBP among participants randomized to intensive treatment increased from 132.8 mm Hg at 5 years to 140.4 mm Hg at 10 years following randomization. The findings suggest the importance of sustaining SBP control to reduce mortality. Source: https://jamanetwork.com/
A secondary MRI analysis of the US POINTER randomized clinical trial found that a structured…
Dementia risk factors vary substantially across countries, but they frequently cluster together in similar patterns…
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 262 randomized trials involving 99,791 participants found that…
Approximately 21% of patients with phenotypically mild hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) experienced major adverse cardiovascular events…
A Danish randomized crossover trial found that a single session of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE)…
Baseline use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and, to a lesser extent, antibiotics was associated…
This website uses cookies.