An international, multicenter, randomized trial concluded that the use of risk assessment with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography–guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who had not undergone biopsy. A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, and avoided a biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P=0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, −13 percentage points; 95% CI, −19 to −7; P<0.001). Source: http://www.nejm.org/
A rigorous cohort study utilizing Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Database provides robust evidence that SGLT2…
A new study investigating the link between cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and dementia has found that…
A comprehensive prospective study tracking over 159,000 adults for up to three decades has provided…
A comprehensive new Cochrane review of 22 studies involving nearly 2,000 participants over six months…
A large-scale study involving 103,649 UK Biobank participants has revealed that adhering to healthy dietary…
To address uncertainties in statin safety profiles, which are often based on observational data susceptible…
This website uses cookies.