An international, multicenter, randomized trial concluded that the use of risk assessment with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography–guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who had not undergone biopsy. A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, and avoided a biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P=0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, −13 percentage points; 95% CI, −19 to −7; P<0.001). Source: http://www.nejm.org/
A study revealed that stroke remains a major global health challenge, influenced by numerous risk…
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomized controlled trials on pharmacological treatments for anxiety in…
A global study suggested that most patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) have Lipoprotein (a)…
A recent article explored the science and skepticism surrounding seed oils. These oils—extracted from sources…
A Canadian study of adults with high blood pressure (BP) found no difference in health…
Two randomized, controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of obicetrapib, an oral cholesteryl ester…
This website uses cookies.