The American College of Physicians criticized that the 2017 blood pressure (BP) guideline may fall short in weighing the potential benefits against potential harms, costs, and anticipated variation in individual patient preferences, especially for average- and lower-risk adults 60 and older. Other experts echoed some of the same concerns, arguing against a one-size-fits-all BP goal. It may be reasonable to consider more aggressive treatment goals in the highest-risk patients. For everyone else, it may be more reasonable to continue defining hypertension as a BP of 140/90 mm Hg or higher and to take an individualized approach, especially for those with poor vascular compliance (i.e., pulse pressures above 80 to 90 mm Hg), who typically have dizziness and poor mentation as their systolic BP approaches 140 mm Hg; for many people over 70 with isolated systolic hypertension. Source: http://annals.org/; http://www.nejm.org/
A meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials involving 4,824 patients with high blood pressure found…
Higher levels of chronic systemic inflammation were associated with smaller left ventricular volumes, compensatory increases…
In patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, carotid revascularization—either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or…
A 2026 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of 107 randomized trials involving 26,886 adults with…
Higher functional-connectivity-derived brain age deviation was consistently associated with poorer cognitive performance—particularly working memory and…
Higher nighttime light exposure was associated with adverse changes in cardiac structure and function and…
This website uses cookies.