The American College of Physicians criticized that the 2017 blood pressure (BP) guideline may fall short in weighing the potential benefits against potential harms, costs, and anticipated variation in individual patient preferences, especially for average- and lower-risk adults 60 and older. Other experts echoed some of the same concerns, arguing against a one-size-fits-all BP goal. It may be reasonable to consider more aggressive treatment goals in the highest-risk patients. For everyone else, it may be more reasonable to continue defining hypertension as a BP of 140/90 mm Hg or higher and to take an individualized approach, especially for those with poor vascular compliance (i.e., pulse pressures above 80 to 90 mm Hg), who typically have dizziness and poor mentation as their systolic BP approaches 140 mm Hg; for many people over 70 with isolated systolic hypertension. Source: http://annals.org/; http://www.nejm.org/

hyangiu

Recent Posts

Global Study of Stroke Risk Factors

A study revealed that stroke remains a major global health challenge, influenced by numerous risk…

2 days ago

Antidepressants Effective and Safe in Older Adults with Anxiety

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomized controlled trials on pharmacological treatments for anxiety in…

3 days ago

Geographical Variation in Lipoprotein (a) Levels Among CHD Patients

A global study suggested that most patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) have Lipoprotein (a)…

2 weeks ago

The Science and Skepticism around Seed Oils

A recent article explored the science and skepticism surrounding seed oils. These oils—extracted from sources…

3 weeks ago

Bedtime Antihypertensive Comparable to Morning Use

A Canadian study of adults with high blood pressure (BP) found no difference in health…

4 weeks ago

Obicetrapib Effective and Safe in Improving Lipids

Two randomized, controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of obicetrapib, an oral cholesteryl ester…

1 month ago

This website uses cookies.