A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
A circadian subtype of depression is associated with earlier disease onset, more severe clinical features,…
A longitudinal study of 995 U.S. older adults found that frequent and unintentional daytime napping…
A multicohort genetic association study found that the ancestry-enriched CD36 Y325* variant accounted for a…
An American College of Cardiology scientific statement emphasizes that exercise should be prescribed as a…
A 16-week low-fat vegan diet was associated with significant reductions in body weight, visceral fat,…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 studies involving 88,830 participants found that intensive blood…
This website uses cookies.