A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
Higher nighttime light exposure was associated with adverse changes in cardiac structure and function and…
In two UK cohorts including 977,282 adults, drinking beverages at a “very hot” temperature was…
In a UK prospective cohort of 502,188 adults followed for a median of 13.6 years,…
Regular smoking was associated with a lower risk of Parkinson disease (PD), and among people…
Alcohol-attributable cancer deaths in the USA doubled from 11,361 in 1990 to 23,126 in 2023,…
A systematic review and meta-analysis found that the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is…
This website uses cookies.