A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
Early-life sugar restriction during pregnancy and infancy was associated with a 34% lower risk of…
Higher levels of physical activity were associated with lower risks of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease,…
In US adults aged ≥65 years, overweight and class I–II obesity were associated with lower…
In community-dwelling older adults without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD), new or persistent heart stress (HS)—defined…
In the German multicenter study of 5,521 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the apparent survival…
In adults aged 75 years or older without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)…
This website uses cookies.