A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
The American Cancer Society (ACS) concludes that the benefits of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer…
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was modestly associated with incident dementia in older adults (pooled…
Extended follow-up of three major trials consistently shows that an initial invasive strategy does not…
Escitalopram, duloxetine, and agomelatine achieved higher sustained response rates than fluoxetine, while escitalopram and duloxetine…
Targeting a systolic blood pressure (BP) of less than 120 mm Hg lowered the incidence…
In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and high cardiovascular risk, targeting a systolic blood…
This website uses cookies.