A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
Children and adolescents who regularly consume sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and fruit juice may face a…
Women who consistently performed resistance training had a substantially lower risk of major cardiovascular disease…
US Adults with prediabetes who participated in an intensive lifestyle intervention had a significantly lower…
The impact of late-life high blood pressure (BP) on dementia risk appears to depend on…
A U.S. study found that receiving the recombinant herpes zoster vaccine (RZV, shingles vaccine) was…
A pooled analysis of 11 prospective cohort studies involving more than 1.5 million adults found…
This website uses cookies.