A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
A Spanish secondary prevention study suggested that Mediterranean diet might reduce neutrophil levels and slow…
Top 10 key takeaway points of the report of the American College of Cardiology Solution…
A UK device-based prospective study suggested that irregular sleep was associated with higher risk of…
A Chinese parallel design, randomized clinical trial showed that the incidence of major cardiovascular events…
A study comparing UK adults conceived just before or after sugar rationing ended found that…
A Chinese nationwide case-crossover study revealed that lower temperatures were associated with higher risks of…
This website uses cookies.