A blinded, multicenter randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a sham procedure for angina relief in the UK revealed that in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis, PCI did not increase exercise time or improve symptoms. 230 patients with ischemic symptoms and severe (≥70%) single-vessel stenosis were enrolled and received 6 weeks of medication optimization, 200 patients underwent randomization between Jan 6, 2014, and Aug 11, 2017. Lesions had mean area stenosis of 84·4%, fractional flow reserve of 0·69, and instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0·76. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment between groups (PCI minus placebo 16·6 s, 95% CI −8·9 to 42·0, p=0·200). The results are consistent with previous findings that PCI in stable lesions did not produce long-term improvements in outcome when compared to optimal medical therapy. PCI has been proven effective in acute coronary syndrome. Source: http://www.thelancet.com/
A prespecified subgroup analysis of a Chinese randomized clinical trial suggested that salt substitution significantly…
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in managing Irritable Bowel Syndrome…
MindShift CBT (Free) – A mobile app based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, helping users…
A US prospective cohort analysis suggested that supine high blood pressure (BP) regardless of seated…
A UK prospective study on diet and colorectal cancer found a marked positive association for…
A Spanish secondary prevention study suggested that Mediterranean diet might reduce neutrophil levels and slow…
This website uses cookies.