A cross-sectional analysis suggested that a multivariable model of clinical and genetic risk factors explains only 36% of the likelihood of family history of heart disease (FHHD), with most of the risk of a FHHD unexplained. The analysis included 166,714 UK Biobank participants with 43.2% reported a FHHD. In the multivariable model, polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease (PRSCAD, OR 1.30), and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH, OR 1.31) were most strongly associated with FHHD, followed by clinical risk factors: hypertension (OR 1.18), lipoprotein(a) (OR 1.17), apolipoprotein B-to-apolipoprotein A1 ratio, (OR 1.13) and triglycerides (OR 1.07). Population attributable risks analyses showed that 21.9% of the risk of reporting a FHHD is attributed to clinical factors, 22.2% is attributed to genetic factors, and 36.0% is attributed to genetic and clinical factors combined. The findings suggest that much of the self-reported FHHD is not explained by currently available genetic and clinical biomarkers and implies knowledge gap. Source: https://academic.oup.com/
A circadian subtype of depression is associated with earlier disease onset, more severe clinical features,…
A longitudinal study of 995 U.S. older adults found that frequent and unintentional daytime napping…
A multicohort genetic association study found that the ancestry-enriched CD36 Y325* variant accounted for a…
An American College of Cardiology scientific statement emphasizes that exercise should be prescribed as a…
A 16-week low-fat vegan diet was associated with significant reductions in body weight, visceral fat,…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 studies involving 88,830 participants found that intensive blood…
This website uses cookies.